What happens if you have to cover two or more different subject areas in the same document? Which audience should you write for? If you try to satisfy everyone, you'll satisfy no one, so play the numbers and aim for the primary audience.
Every area of study has its own way of looking at the world, and that is how it should be. For example, a musician and a nuclear physicist look at sound very differently; a chemist and a cook rarely regard a pot roast in the same light. To prove my point, here's the same topic as approached by writers in two different areas. The first writer is an historian; the second writer, a geologist.
From the pen of the historian:
From the pen of the geologist:
Concern for audience (and propriety) reached absurd heights during the Victorian era, when the author of Lady Gough's Book of Etiquette advised Victorians with a home library to avoid placing books by married male authors next to those by female authors, and vice versa.
As you can see, the same subject can vary greatly when written for a different audience. The first paragraph concentrates on the impact of an earthquake on one ancient city. The second paragraph, in contrast, centers on two ways to measure the impact of an earthquake. In the second passage, there's no mention of any specific human involvement, since the writer focuses on quantifying the experience.
Further, many types of writing blur the boundaries between curriculum areas. Henry David Thoreau's classic guide to good living, Walden, could be considered social science, humanities, and botany. The following excerpt might fall into all these categories and economics, too. How would you classify the passage?
|But to be more particular, for it is complained that Mr. Coleman has reported chiefly the expensive experiments of gentlemen farmers, my outgoes were,|
|For a hoe||$0 54|
|Ploughing, harrowing, and furrowing||7 50 Too much.|
|Beans for seed||3 12 1/2|
|Turnip seed||0 06|
|White line for crow fence||0 02|
|Horse cultivator and boy three hours||1 00|
|Horse and cart to get crop||0 75|
|In all||$14 72 1/2|
Thoreau follows this balance sheet with a list of his income and a calculation of his profit.
It's plain that the four types of writing—exposition, narration, argumentation, and description—still apply to writing across the curriculum. See? Writing across the curriculum isn't anything very new from what you've already learned. In addition, it's often a matter of format and vocabulary that shapes writing across the curriculum, not a different kind of writing.
Let's look at techniques you can use as you write across the curriculum, starting with establishing a bond with your audience.
As you've learned, each subject area has its own specific writing style and slant; however, all subjects overlap to some degree. The following table shows some of the similarities and differences among the various curricula.
|Has set purpose||Follows rules of subject area|
|Aimed at a specific audience||May follow specific format|
|Has a clear thesis||Uses specialized language|
|Is well-organized||Tone suits specific subject|
|Uses details and examples||May use passive voice (science)|
|Has an effective style||Uses correct documentation style|
So what types of writing will you be called on to produce? Here's the run-down on each subject area and the most common writing tasks:
|Subject Area||Common Writing Tasks|
|reports resumés and cover letters|
|Humanities (literature, language, philosophy, religion, etc.)||reaction papers|
term and research papers
|Social Sciences (sociology, political science, psychology, education, economics)||term and research papers|
|Natural Sciences (medicine, engineering, geology, physics, computer science, astronomy, biology, chemistry)||reports|
Excerpted from The Complete Idiot's Guide to Writing Well © 2000 by Laurie Rozakis, Ph.D.. All rights reserved including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Used by arrangement with Alpha Books, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.